Ripple Takes Charge: How XRP’s Parent Company Is Rewriting U.S. Crypto Regulation in 2025
Ripple isn't just navigating regulatory waters—it's charting the map. As U.S. lawmakers scramble to catch up with crypto's breakneck evolution, the San Francisco firm has emerged as the de facto architect of blockchain policy. Here's why.
The inside game: While Bitcoin maximalists rage against the machine and Ethereum devs build in stealth, Ripple's lobbying team has quietly locked down more D.C. hallway meetings than a Goldman Sachs alum. Their playbook? Frame XRP as the bridge between TradFi and DeFi—and watch regulators nod along.
Regulation by lawsuit: Remember when the SEC tried to bury Ripple in 2020? Turns out losing that case gave the company something priceless: legal precedent. Now every draft bill references 'the Ripple ruling' like scripture. Ironic—the 'security' debate got settled by the very enforcement action meant to kill them.
The cynical kicker: Nothing unites politicians faster than the scent of future campaign donations. Ripple's policy wins just happen to align perfectly with their $250M war chest for 'regulatory engagement.' How... convenient.
Love them or hate them, one thing's clear: When the crypto regulation dust settles, the rules will bear Ripple's fingerprints. The real question? Whether that's a victory for innovation—or just another case of regulatory capture by well-heeled insiders.
$3 has joined the companies responding to the U.S. Senate Banking Committee’s request for information on the proposed crypto market structure legislation. Stuart Alderoty, Ripple’s Chief Legal Officer, expressed the company’s readiness to contribute to this legislative effort based on their experiences with regulatory bodies. The draft law is considered crucial for the future of the crypto market in the United States, and extensive feedback from industry participants is sought.
ContentsRipple’s Response and InsightsMain Objectives of the Legislation
Ripple’s Response and Insights
In its response to the Senate’s request for information, Ripple emphasized their aim to provide suggestions that would make the proposed legislation more effective and transparent, drawing from their extensive experience. Senior executive Stuart Alderoty underscored their intention to offer concrete and experience-based contributions to the draft law, pointing to the processes they have gone through with various regulators.
Alderoty stated, “Thank you for the opportunity to respond to your request for information. With over a decade of working with regulators worldwide and lessons from our struggle with the SEC, Ripple welcomes the opportunity to provide our unique perspective as Congress advances legislation that protects consumers while fostering crypto innovation.”
Ripple’s response coincides with other companies and groups in the crypto sector assessing the committee’s request. The information sought by the committee highlights the search for strengthening the legal groundwork for cryptocurrencies in the U.S. Operational players in the crypto markets expressing their views on new regulations aim to provide varied perspectives to the legislative preparation process.
Ripple’s introductory statement to the committee outlines the importance of the proposed legislation in clarifying the jurisdiction of digital assets between the CFTC and SEC. It points out that while the draft attempts to define SEC’s jurisdiction over digital assets, it inadvertently creates uncertainty for the industry. There is a call for further revisions to clarify jurisdictional boundaries and establish a balanced oversight framework by potentially including the concept of auxiliary assets.
Main Objectives of the Legislation
The proposed legislation aims to define more clearly the fundamental structures and activities within the crypto market, focusing on investor protection, increasing market transparency, and managing potential risks.
The views submitted by industry representatives to the committee will contribute to shaping the technical details of the draft. Insights from companies like Ripple, which originate from within the industry, can particularly help clarify some of the contentious regulatory points in the U.S.
Gathering the opinions of different entities operating in the crypto market is considered an important step toward updating the regulatory framework and enhancing market safety for the future of the industry.
As the committee continues working on the final report and draft law text, the contributions from industry stakeholders remain vital. Opinions from Ripple and other companies that have similarly provided responses are thought to potentially influence the legislative preparation process.
You can follow our news on Telegram, Facebook, Twitter & Coinmarketcap Disclaimer: The information contained in this article does not constitute investment advice. Investors should be aware that cryptocurrencies carry high volatility and therefore risk, and should conduct their own research.