Weekly Crypto Regulation Roundup: DOJ Bitcoin Sale Sparks Alarm and U.S. Crypto Laws Face Election Headwinds
DOJ Bitcoin Dump Rattles Markets as Election Year Politics Threaten Regulatory Progress
Government Sells Seized Assets
The Department of Justice just unloaded another tranche of seized Bitcoin—a move that sent shivers through trading desks. These forced sales create artificial sell pressure, disrupting natural market dynamics. It’s the financial equivalent of the government auctioning off confiscated sports cars and wondering why Ferrari prices get volatile.
Legislation Stalls Amid Political Maneuvering
Key crypto bills are now stuck in legislative purgatory. With elections looming, bipartisan support has evaporated as lawmakers retreat to partisan corners. The regulatory clarity everyone craves? Postponed until further notice—likely until after the next political cycle settles.
Industry Braces for Impact
Exchanges and funds are recalculating their compliance roadmaps. The uncertainty forces a defensive stance—slowing innovation and pushing some operations to reconsider their U.S. footprint. When regulation moves at the speed of politics, the market gets left holding the bag.
The path forward is now a waiting game. The real legislation won't start until the polls close, leaving crypto to navigate another year of regulatory ambiguity. Perfect timing for an asset class built on predicting the future.
Prediction Markets Put Washington on Alert
One of the week’s most politically charged stories came from Rep. Ritchie Torres, who is preparing legislation to restrict how U.S. officials participate in prediction markets.
@RitchieTorres moves to ban officials from trading on prediction markets after $400K Maduro bet.
#PredictionMarkets #USPolitics https://t.co/SgGankYd1U
The MOVE follows scrutiny over a reportedly lucrative bet linked to the sudden capture of Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, which raised concerns about insider access to sensitive information.
Torres’ proposed Public Integrity in Financial Prediction Markets Act of 2026 WOULD bar federal officials from trading contracts tied to political or policy outcomes when they possess or could reasonably access material nonpublic information.
The issue strikes at a growing fault line in crypto regulation: while decentralized and on-chain markets promise transparency, they also expose longstanding weaknesses in ethics rules governing public officials. Prediction markets, once niche products, are now forcing lawmakers to confront conflicts of interest that traditional financial regulations were never designed to address.
DOJ Bitcoin Sale Raises Policy Consistency Questions
Elsewhere, the U.S. Department of Justice drew criticism after selling 57 Bitcoin forfeited by Samourai Wallet developers, despite an executive order requiring forfeited Bitcoin to be transferred to the Strategic Bitcoin Reserve rather than liquidated.
The sale, reportedly executed through Coinbase Prime, has reignited questions about how seriously federal agencies are taking Bitcoin’s evolving role as a strategic asset.
If executive orders governing digital assets can be disregarded or misinterpreted at the agency level, it weakens confidence in Washington’s ability to manage crypto policy consistently.
For an industry already wary of enforcement-first regulation, the episode reinforces concerns that internal coordination on crypto remains uneven at best.
Election Politics Threaten Market Structure Reform
At the legislative level, optimism around a comprehensive crypto market structure bill is again being tested. A new note from TD Cowen warns that the 2026 midterm elections could delay passage of a unified regulatory framework until 2027 or later.
The 2026 US midterm elections could delay passage of a major crypto market structure bill until 2027, TD Cowen warns.#Crypto #Regulationhttps://t.co/VZA62Cevys
Senate Banking Committee Chair Tim Scott has now set January 15 as a hard deadline to move the bill to markup, indicating impatience with months of stalled negotiations.
But political realities loom large. Some Senate Democrats remain hesitant to advance sweeping legislation ahead of elections, while conflict-of-interest provisions—including those affecting senior political figures—continue to complicate talks.
The risk is clear: as the election clock ticks down, crypto regulation could once again fall victim to partisan positioning.
Stablecoins Advance While Policy Lags
Meanwhile, developments at the state level, including Wyoming’s launch of a state-backed stablecoin, reflect a widening gap between innovation and federal policymaking.
While states and private actors push ahead with new financial infrastructure, Congress struggles to provide a unifying framework that could support responsible growth nationwide.
US community bankers are urging Congress to close what they see as a loophole allowing stablecoin rewards.#Crypto #bankshttps://t.co/2uuk96PfXH
A Market Moving Faster Than Its Regulators
What unites these stories is not opposition to crypto, but fragmentation. Lawmakers agree the industry matters, yet differ on ethics, custody, enforcement, and timing. The result is a regulatory environment defined more by reaction than strategy.
As institutional adoption accelerates and crypto infrastructure becomes increasingly embedded in the financial system, the cost of delay is rising. Whether Washington can bridge its internal divides before the next election cycle remains uncertain—but markets are unlikely to wait.
