WazirX Founder Confirms: Indian Crypto Exchange’s Dispute with Binance Escalates to Formal Litigation

It's not a spat anymore—it's a lawsuit. The simmering tension between Indian crypto exchange WazirX and global giant Binance has officially boiled over into the courtroom.

From Boardroom Brawl to Legal Battle

Forget back-channel negotiations. The founder's confirmation signals a hard pivot to litigation, a move that cuts through the usual corporate diplomacy. This isn't about resolving differences; it's about claiming damages and setting precedents. The dispute, once confined to press releases and industry gossip, now gets a docket number.

Why This Fight Matters

This escalation throws a wrench into the narrative of seamless global crypto integration. It exposes the raw, contractual friction behind the scenes when partnerships fracture. For users caught in the middle, it translates to uncertainty over assets and platform access—never a good look for an industry selling the future of finance.

The Ripple Effect

Watch for tremors. A public, messy legal fight between a major local player and the world's largest exchange could spook regulators already eyeing the sector with skepticism. It hands them a ready-made case study on operational risks—the kind that gets cited in future restrictive legislation, probably right after a line about 'investor protection.'

No Quick Fix in Sight

Legal proceedings grind slowly. This move locks both parties into a long, expensive, and public process. It's a high-stakes gamble that bypasses the quiet settlement, betting that a court's ruling will deliver what closed-door talks could not. Sometimes, you don't just want a resolution—you want a verdict.

The whole saga serves as a cynical reminder: in crypto, the most volatile asset isn't always the token—sometimes it's the partnership agreement it's traded on.

Ownership dispute between WazirX and Binance

During the conversation, Shetty reiterated that WazirX was sold around late 2019-early 2020, following a public announcement at the time.

However, what followed were conflicting claims, which saw both sides publicly disputing ownership of the platform. Binance denied holding any stake in WazirX. However, the Indian exchange claimed to have all the legal documents proving otherwise, which is how the ownership dispute began.

As things stand, Shetty claims the dispute is at a “he said, she said” stage, which makes the outcome of the litigation much more important.

When Shetty was asked whether Binance reached out to WazirX following the hack that shook the platform in July 2024, Shetty declined to comment, claiming the matter is under sub-judice.

This is the latest development regarding the case, whose origins can be traced to the year 2019, after the crypto company announced that Binance had acquired it.

What did Shetty say about custody dispute with Liminal?

During his talk with TheStreet Roundtable host Mehab Qureshi, Shetty also addressed its dispute with Liminal, a digital asset custody and wallet infrastructure platform designed to help institutions, crypto exchanges, and digital asset businesses securely manage and store cryptocurrencies and tokenized assets.

After the initial shock of the July 2024 hack that rocked WazirX by targeting its multi-signature wallet and resulting in a loss of over $230 million, the exchange blamed Liminal, claiming it was linked to Liminal’s multi-signature wallet infrastructure. It also pledged to migrate all remaining assets to a new multi-signature wallet, promising full transparency by publishing a list of all new wallets post-migration.

Things got interesting when Liminal issued a counter-statement on October 22, 2024, denying responsibility for the breach. It claimed that 75 days after the hack, WazirX still held more than $175 million in assets on its platform, with roughly $50 million still under WazirX’s control via Liminal’s infrastructure.

While in a conversation with TheStreet Roundtable host Mehab Qureshi, Shetty confirmed that the exchange had indeed been using Liminal’s software for custody infrastructure, but WazirX itself was always the primary point of contact for users.

Shetty claims the exchange used Liminal’s technology for multi-key security with address whitelisting, ensuring that transactions could only be approved for preapproved wallets.

“This was done so that even if all the devices of our team members got compromised, there’s a third party that WOULD do the final check before authorizing a transaction,” he said.

WazirX has claimed the cyberattack occurred through an external website used for fund management, not its own servers or hot wallets.

“The cyber attack was not on the infrastructure, like the service of WazirX,” Shetty said. “It was a website that we were using for managing these funds, and through that website, the cyber attack happened”.

According to him, the exchange had limited visibility into what happened “behind the scenes of a different website” and is awaiting further details from Liminal.

“We only know our part. We have three laptops that were interacting with our website. Now we don’t know anything beyond that,” Shetty stated.

Get seen where it counts. Advertise in Cryptopolitan Research and reach crypto’s sharpest investors and builders.