Wall Street Banks Rocket Toward $157 Billion Profit as Trading Frenzy Refuses to Cool

Trading desks aren't just humming—they're roaring. While Main Street frets, the titans of finance are minting money at a pace that would make even Gordon Gekko blush.

The Engine Room: Volatility as Fuel

Forget boring old interest income. The real action is on the trading floor. Market swings that give retail investors heartburn are pure profit potential for institutions with the tech and leverage to play both sides. It's the ultimate hedge: when markets move, they win.

The $157 Billion Question

That staggering number isn't a projection from a bull-run fantasy. It's the hard, cold trajectory based on current momentum. It speaks to a financial ecosystem where high-frequency algorithms and structured products capture value from every tick, siphon fees from every transaction, and turn chaos into quarterly earnings beats.

A Cynical Aside

Of course, this windfall has nothing to do with altruism or 'market-making.' It's the lucrative business of being the house in a global casino where the rules are written in their favor and the deck is perpetually stacked. The only surprise is that anyone is still surprised.

The takeaway? In modern finance, panic and euphoria are just different revenue streams. And right now, the taps are wide open.

Trading desks stay busy as clients react to Washington

Trump’s policy style kept clients active. Each major announcement pushed investors to adjust positions, which fed straight into trading revenue. That activity helped the bank sector post steady fees even while lending slowed during the first half of the year. Many borrowers waited to see where policy landed before committing to new loans.

The uncertainty worked both ways. Trading desks enjoyed strong quarters, but loan growth stayed soft early on. Gerard Cassidy of RBC Capital Markets said businesses learned how to operate under the noise coming out of Washington. After introducing him once, Cassidy said companies now manage the uncertainty better than before.

Dealmaking finally broke loose in the second half. Advisory teams landed roles on some of the largest transactions of the year. JPMorgan and Goldman advised on the roughly $55 billion buyout of Electronic Arts. Financing followed quickly. Lenders stepped in with large commitments, and JPMorgan wrote some of the biggest checks.

Citigroup also signaled strength. Mark Mason, the firm’s chief financial officer, said in December that his bank expected investment‑banking fees to rise in the mid‑20% range during the final quarter of 2025. Analysts now expect five of the six firms to generate about $9.9 billion in investment‑banking fees for the quarter, up 12.8% from a year earlier.

Jefferies Financial Group offered an early data point. The firm reported a 20% jump in investment‑banking revenue to $1.19 billion for its fiscal fourth quarter, though that period ended in November and does not line up perfectly with calendar results.

Matt Zimmer of William Blair said activity picked up late in the year. After introducing him once, Matt said supply and demand finally came together as markets reopened.

Rates and balance sheets reshape next year outlook

Market swings also helped trading desks. The S&P 500 ROSE about 16% last year, adding fuel to equity businesses across the banking industry. Analysts expect trading revenue to rise nearly 13% at JPMorgan and 9.3% at Bank of America. Goldman is forecast to post a 6.3% increase. Citigroup may see a 2.7% decline due to weaker fixed‑income results.

Morgan Stanley faces a tougher comparison. Its stock trading revenue jumped 51% in the fourth quarter of 2024. Even so, estimates point to fourth‑quarter revenue of $5.46 billion, up from $5.26 billion a year earlier.

Looking ahead, analysts say guidance matters as much as current earnings. Morgan Stanley analysts led by Betsy Graseck said confirmation of a capital‑markets rebound will be closely watched. Forecasts for 2026 could benefit if interest rates fall.

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell is set to leave in May, and TRUMP has campaigned for lower rates. TD Cowen analyst Steven Alexopoulos wrote that Trump may choose a more dovish successor.

Rate cuts usually let each bank pay less on deposits, lowering funding costs. Balance sheets may also improve as five‑year securities bought in 2021 reach maturity. Those low‑yield assets hurt profits and added paper losses across the bank system. As they roll off at par, firms can reinvest at higher yields.

Cassidy said the setup looks favorable. After introducing him earlier, Gerard said bonds bought in 2020 and 2021 are coming due this year, and the bank sector can now place that money into higher‑yield assets.

Join a premium crypto trading community free for 30 days - normally $100/mo.