BTCC / BTCC Square / CryptotimesIO /
India HPZ Token Scam: CBI Names 30 Accused in Major Crypto Fraud - The Regulatory Reckoning

India HPZ Token Scam: CBI Names 30 Accused in Major Crypto Fraud - The Regulatory Reckoning

Published:
2025-12-11 01:29:25
20
3

Another day, another crypto scandal hits the headlines—this time with a distinctly Indian flavor. The Central Bureau of Investigation has officially named 30 individuals in connection with the HPZ token scam, a major fraud case that's sending shockwaves through the country's burgeoning digital asset space.

The Anatomy of a Modern Scam

Forget complex DeFi exploits or flash loan attacks. This scheme reportedly followed a classic playbook: promise outsized returns on a seemingly legitimate token, then vanish with the funds. It's a reminder that while the technology evolves, human greed remains a constant—and regulators are finally catching up. The CBI's move signals a clear shift from passive observation to active enforcement.

A Watershed Moment for Indian Crypto

This isn't just about 30 accused. It's a landmark case that could define India's entire regulatory approach to digital assets. The investigation cuts through the noise of speculative hype and targets the fraud undermining real adoption. Expect tighter KYC norms, stricter exchange oversight, and a lot more scrutiny on "guaranteed return" projects. The era of the wild west might be closing.

The Irony of Trust

Here's the cynical finance jab: the same traditional systems these scams often aim to bypass—banks, regulated exchanges—are now the ones cleaning up the mess. It's almost poetic. The promise of decentralization gets sold, but when things go south, everyone runs straight back to centralized authorities like the CBI.

The crackdown is live. For legitimate builders, it's a painful but necessary purge. For scammers, the party's over. The message is clear: innovate, but don't steal. The market might be volatile, but the long arm of the law is finding its range.

How the HPZ app drew money in just months

The app, called HPZ Tokens, claimed that users’ money would be put into cryptocurrency mining and that investors would receive unusually high returns in quick cycles. The promise worked. Within a short three-month window, the platform pulled in hundreds of crores from individuals across the country who were already financially stressed during the pandemic.

None of the money ever went into any form of mining, the CBI confirmed. Instead, investigators found that the funds were funnelled through a chain of shell companies created solely to collect the deposits and MOVE them out of reach.

Chinese nationals at the core of the operation

Two Chinese nationals, Wan Jun and Li Anming, have been named among the accused. According to the charge sheet, both were instrumental in designing and directing the operation from overseas, using local associates in India to execute the scheme on the ground. 

According to investigators, Wan Jun headed Jilian Consultants India Pvt. Ltd., the local subsidiary of a Chinese parent entity, Jilian Consultants, and oversaw the creation of several shell companies used throughout the scheme.

One of these entities, Shigoo Technologies Pvt. Ltd., served as a primary vehicle for running the HPZ app and managing investor funds. The CBI has said that more than ₹1,000 crore passed through accounts linked to these companies in just a few months — an unusually fast movement of money that first brought the scam under the scanner.

The agency believes the HPZ app was not an isolated venture but one piece of a larger cybercrime network operating from overseas. The same syndicate is suspected to be behind a string of post-pandemic scams involving fake loan apps, investment platforms, and bogus online job offers — all of which targeted Indian users on a large scale.

Payment Aggregators misused for high-speed laundering

One of the major concerns highlighted in the charge sheet is the misuse of Payment Aggregators — a sector that had only just begun to expand in India at the time. These systems, intended to help legitimate businesses process digital payments quickly, were allegedly exploited to move money across dozens of accounts in seconds.

The CBI wrote that, “The technology has allowed users to access a large number of bank accounts simultaneously.” This enabled the scammers to LAYER and hide funds before anyone could flag the transactions. In many cases, small payouts were made back to early investors to create trust and keep the scheme afloat.

Money converted to crypto to evade tracking

After circulating the funds through several layers of companies, the operators allegedly converted a substantial portion of the money into cryptocurrency, making it harder to trace and easier to move out of India. 

Chartered accountants and company secretaries were brought in to set up the shell firms and keep the paperwork clean enough to pass basic scrutiny.

Investigators say they have now identified the key organisers behind the network, though searches and financial tracking continue for additional suspects.

Arrests and ongoing probe

Six people have already been arrested earlier in the case: Dortse, Rajni Kohli, Sushanta Behra, Abhishek, Mohammed Imdhad Husain, and Rajat Jain. In the latest filing, the CBI has formally named 27 individuals and three companies, taking the total to 30 accused.

In a related proceeding, one of the main accused in the broader ₹2,200-crore HPZ matter has already been declared a fugitive economic offender earlier this year.

Meanwhile, the CBI has said it is “steadfast in its unwavering commitment to dismantling these sophisticated cyber fraud networks through relentless operations like Chakra-V.” The agency added that more arrests and seizures are expected as the investigation expands internationally.

Also Read: India Cracks Down on crypto Traders with 44,000 Tax Notices

    

Google News

mobile only image

|Square

Get the BTCC app to start your crypto journey

Get started today Scan to join our 100M+ users

All articles reposted on this platform are sourced from public networks and are intended solely for the purpose of disseminating industry information. They do not represent any official stance of BTCC. All intellectual property rights belong to their original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon your rights or is suspected of copyright violation, please contact us at [email protected]. We will address the matter promptly and in accordance with applicable laws.BTCC makes no explicit or implied warranties regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the republished information and assumes no direct or indirect liability for any consequences arising from reliance on such content. All materials are provided for industry research reference only and shall not be construed as investment, legal, or business advice. BTCC bears no legal responsibility for any actions taken based on the content provided herein.