BTCC / BTCC Square / coincentral /
16 Billion XRP on Exchanges: Are Liquidity Fears for an XRP ETF Overblown?

16 Billion XRP on Exchanges: Are Liquidity Fears for an XRP ETF Overblown?

Published:
2025-12-29 16:25:22
6
2

XRP ETF Liquidity Fears Questioned Amid 16B XRP on CEX Balances

Fears of insufficient liquidity for a potential XRP exchange-traded fund are facing fresh scrutiny. The catalyst? A massive 16 billion XRP currently sitting on centralized exchange balances.

Decoding the On-Chain Signal

That mountain of tokens—worth billions—represents immediate, tradeable supply. For ETF issuers, it's a critical data point. Traditional finance often frets about crypto market depth, but this on-chain reality paints a different picture: the foundational liquidity for a large-scale financial product might already be in place.

Beyond the Theoretical Market

The debate has shifted from pure speculation to analyzing tangible, blockchain-verified assets. This available float directly challenges the narrative that an XRP ETF would struggle with creation and redemption mechanics. It suggests the market infrastructure, at least on the supply side, is more mature than critics claim.

A cynical observer might note that Wall Street only gets truly interested in an asset's 'liquidity' once it figures out how to charge a fee for wrapping it. For now, the data speaks—and it's shouting down the doubters.

TLDR

  • XRP traders are divided over whether XRP ETFs are causing a supply shortage on exchanges.
  • A viral post claimed that only 1.5 billion XRP remains on exchanges due to recent ETF activity.
  • Validator Vet responded by stating that 16 billion XRP is still held across major centralized exchanges.
  • Vet explained that XRP supply is dynamic because tokens can move to exchanges within seconds.
  • Some traders believe escrow rules and institutional custody could reduce effective XRP supply.

A growing divide has emerged among XRP traders over the impact of XRP ETF activity on exchange liquidity. Some traders argue supply is tightening, while others present higher exchange-held XRP figures. Disagreements center on the accuracy of on-chain data and potential effects on market price.

XRP ETF Supply Concerns Trigger Disputes

A post on X dated Dec. 27 claimed only 1.5 billion XRP remain on exchanges. The account unknowDLT linked this to XRP ETF inflows and warned of a possible “supply shock.” It estimated that around 750 million XRP had moved off exchanges in recent weeks.

The post projected a liquidity crunch by 2026 under the proposed “Clarity Act” legislation. This claim quickly circulated across XRP trading communities, triggering heated reactions. Some traders began speculating about XRP ETF-driven market effects.

However, not all participants agreed with the forecast. A validator on XRP Ledger, named Vet, responded with counter data. VET said exchanges hold nearly 16 billion XRP, far higher than the viral claim.

Validators Defend High Liquidity Data

Vet published updated figures on Dec. 28 disputing the 1.5 billion XRP claim. “Markets are too dynamic to statically plot movements,” the validator stated in their post. They emphasized the fluid nature of XRP supply due to fast token transfers.

According to Vet, XRP holders can MOVE funds to exchanges in three to four seconds. They argued this makes the market less vulnerable to long-term imbalances. Vet described the viral post’s projection as misleading.

They also highlighted differences in wallet tracking methodology. Vet shared that Upbit alone holds around 2 billion XRP across four known wallets. However, they said those represent only part of the actual holdings.

Traders Debate Custody and Escrow Mechanics

Trader Dman argued the effective circulating supply could tighten from escrow and custody rules. They suggested XRP ETF accumulation is happening in dedicated wallets. Dman said these holdings now account for around 1% of total XRP supply.

They further stated that Ripple’s monthly escrow releases could impact available liquidity. This could slowly reduce tradeable XRP over time. Some interpreted this as indirect support for the supply shock idea.

In response, Vet acknowledged Ripple facilitates ETF transfers but rejected panic-based conclusions. They reiterated that steady buying does not constitute a true supply crisis. Vet asserted only immediate allocation shifts would create shocks.

On-Chain Metrics Continue Fueling Debate

Validator Vet confirmed that XRP ETF activity is reflected in Ripple reports. However, they insisted billions of XRP remain available in Ripple operational wallets. These reserves could cover surging demand if needed.

Critics still question whether exchange-held balances are overstated due to wallet misclassification. Commentator Zach Rector voiced doubts over the accuracy of some exchange balance figures. Vet maintained the shared data was conservative.

As the debate grows, traders continue monitoring XRP ETF flows and wallet data. The XRP Ledger’s open nature allows real-time analysis of large transfers. Market watchers remain divided on the outcome.

The argument underscores the difficulty of interpreting dynamic on-chain activity. Different methods produce vastly different views of available XRP. This has created friction across the trading community.

|Square

Get the BTCC app to start your crypto journey

Get started today Scan to join our 100M+ users

All articles reposted on this platform are sourced from public networks and are intended solely for the purpose of disseminating industry information. They do not represent any official stance of BTCC. All intellectual property rights belong to their original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon your rights or is suspected of copyright violation, please contact us at [email protected]. We will address the matter promptly and in accordance with applicable laws.BTCC makes no explicit or implied warranties regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the republished information and assumes no direct or indirect liability for any consequences arising from reliance on such content. All materials are provided for industry research reference only and shall not be construed as investment, legal, or business advice. BTCC bears no legal responsibility for any actions taken based on the content provided herein.