OpenAI vs Anthropic: Clashing AI Titans Reveal Starkly Different Adoption Patterns in 2025
Two AI giants just dropped their usage reports—and the divergence couldn't be more dramatic.
OpenAI's tools are dominating enterprise workflows while Anthropic's ethical approach attracts academic purists.
Wall Street's already placing bets on which model will crash first when the next crypto-style bubble pops.
Meanwhile, developers are voting with their API keys—creating a fascinating split in real-world AI adoption.
The race isn't about who's smarter anymore—it's about who gets used.
Elevate Your Investing Strategy:
- Take advantage of TipRanks Premium at 50% off! Unlock powerful investing tools, advanced data, and expert analyst insights to help you invest with confidence.
OpenAI’s research found that over 70% of ChatGPT conversations are not related to work, a big jump from 53% in June 2024. Only 27% of messages were work-related, down from 47% a year earlier. The top reasons people use ChatGPT are for advice, writing help, and learning new information, which together make up almost 78% of all chats. When ChatGPT is used for work, it’s often as a helpful assistant that guides decisions rather than doing tasks directly. Writing tasks were the most popular work use, especially among business professionals, with most users asking for edits to existing text.
Interestingly, just 4.2% of people used it for coding, and satisfaction in that category was the lowest. In contrast, Anthropic’s report shows that Claude is being used mainly for work, especially by software engineers and researchers. Coding is the most common use across all countries. Education and scientific research are growing fast, while office-related tasks like management and finance are becoming less common. Businesses using Claude through its API mostly automate tasks, with 77% of them being done fully by the AI. This includes coding, admin support, and even helping build or test other AI systems.
Which Tech Stock Is the Better Buy?
Turning to Wall Street, out of the two stocks mentioned above, analysts think that MSFT stock has more room to run than AMZN. In fact, MSFT’s price target of $626.88 per share implies 22.5% upside versus AMZN’s 14%.
