BTCC / BTCC Square / CointribuneEN /
Ethereum’s Real Value: The Debate Ignites Again in 2025

Ethereum’s Real Value: The Debate Ignites Again in 2025

Published:
2025-12-01 10:45:00
8
2

Is Ethereum's trillion-dollar valuation built on code or hype? The question is back, and the answers are louder than ever.

The Core of the Controversy

Critics point to transaction fees that still bite and scaling solutions that feel perpetually 'almost there.' They see a network straining under its own success, where gas wars make simple swaps a luxury. Proponents fire back with the unstoppable engine of decentralized finance—billions locked, moving, and creating value without a bank in sight. It's not just a ledger; it's the foundational settlement layer for a new internet.

Beyond the Price Chart

The real value debate cuts deeper than ETH's spot price. It's about network effects versus technical debt. It's about whether Ethereum can hold its crown as the de facto world computer while newer, faster chains nip at its heels. Every developer building a dApp, every institution tokenizing a real-world asset, is casting a vote.

The market, of course, has the final say—often with the subtlety of a sledgehammer. One day it's pricing in flawless execution of the roadmap; the next, it's panicking over a delayed upgrade like a trader who just spotted a typo in a quarterly report. The volatility isn't a bug; it's a feature of this high-stakes experiment.

So, where does the truth lie? Somewhere between the purist's vision and the pragmatist's spreadsheet. Ethereum's value isn't a static number. It's a live bet on a decentralized future—constantly being challenged, proven, and redefined.

A magnifying glass held by a crypto trader reveals that each Ethereum contains a hidden micro-universe of value.

Read us on Google News

In Brief

  • A new study conducted by CryptoQuant states that Ether (ETH) is largely undervalued by the current market.
  • Out of 12 economic models analyzed, 9 estimate that the real value of ETH significantly exceeds the current $3,000.
  • The average valuation from these models places ETH around $4,836, a positive gap of +58 %.
  • The Revenue Yield model, however, estimates that ETH is overvalued by more than 50 %.

A Majority of Models Converge : ETH Largely Undervalued

According to Ki Young Ju, CEO of CryptoQuant, the majority of valuation models applied to Ethereum reach the same conclusion: ETH is undervalued at its current price.

“These models were built by trusted experts from academia and traditional finance”, he states. Out of the 12 models analyzed, 9 estimate that the price of ETH should be well beyond the current $3,000. By cross-referencing this data, an average composite value of ETH is estimated at $4,836, 58 % higher than its market valuation.

Among the most notable models in this study, several stand out due to their analytical approach and results :

  • The App Capital Model : accounts for all on-chain assets on Ethereum (stablecoins, ERC-20 tokens, NFTs, RWA, etc.) with a valuation of $4,918 for the crypto ;
  • The Metcalfe’s Law based model : values the network based on the square of active users with an estimated valuation of $9,484, or +211 % compared to the current price ;
  • The Layer 2 TVL model : relies on the total value locked in Ethereum’s scalability solutions (Arbitrum, Optimism, etc.) with an estimated valuation of $4,633.

In total, 8 of the 12 models are considered sufficiently reliable, rated two out of three or higher according to ETHval’s criteria.

All these approaches reflect an optimistic view of ETH’s intrinsic value, fueled by the growth of its ecosystem, the increasing adoption of L2 solutions, and the expansion of use cases related to tokenized assets. Based on this data, the market is today clearly out of step with the economic reality projected by the Ethereum network.

A Disruptive Model : The Crypto Would Be Overvalued by More Than 50 %

Despite the apparent consensus among most models, some methodological approaches temper or even contradict this optimistic reading. The Revenue Yield model reveals that Ether WOULD be significantly overvalued at its current levels.

This model, described as “the most reliable” within the study, relies on a simple but rigorous methodology : dividing the annual revenues generated by the Ethereum network by the yield obtained through staking. According to calculations, the crypto should trade around $1,296, far from current levels, indicating an overvaluation of 57 %.

This pessimistic view is based on a tangible fact: the drop in revenues of the Ethereum network. Transaction fees have hit historically low levels, reflecting a decline in on-chain activity, while other emerging blockchains are nibbling away at the network’s market share.

This revenue decline mechanically affects staking yield, the very basis of this valuation model. Unlike other more projected or theoretical approaches, the Revenue Yield model favors a fundamental and immediate reading, focused on the net cash flows generated by the Ethereum crypto network.

While Ethereum raises its gas limit to 60M, strengthening its technical capabilities, the debate about its valuation takes on a new dimension. Between bullish projections and methodological caution, the market will have to decide: is ETH truly undervalued or simply ahead of its economic reality?

Maximize your Cointribune experience with our "Read to Earn" program! For every article you read, earn points and access exclusive rewards. Sign up now and start earning benefits.


|Square

Get the BTCC app to start your crypto journey

Get started today Scan to join our 100M+ users

All articles reposted on this platform are sourced from public networks and are intended solely for the purpose of disseminating industry information. They do not represent any official stance of BTCC. All intellectual property rights belong to their original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon your rights or is suspected of copyright violation, please contact us at [email protected]. We will address the matter promptly and in accordance with applicable laws.BTCC makes no explicit or implied warranties regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the republished information and assumes no direct or indirect liability for any consequences arising from reliance on such content. All materials are provided for industry research reference only and shall not be construed as investment, legal, or business advice. BTCC bears no legal responsibility for any actions taken based on the content provided herein.