BTCC / BTCC Square / coincentral /
CZ Takes Aim: Binance’s New Defense Against $50M Address Poisoning Scourge

CZ Takes Aim: Binance’s New Defense Against $50M Address Poisoning Scourge

Published:
2025-12-25 21:20:11
14
2

Binance’s CZ Proposes New Measures to Combat Address Poisoning After $50M Loss

Another week, another multi-million dollar crypto heist—this time, address poisoning snags a cool $50 million. The industry's favorite punching bag, blockchain's 'user error' problem, strikes again.

The Poison in the System

Forget sophisticated hacks. This attack vector is brutally simple. Scammers send dust transactions to wallets, creating fake histories with look-alike addresses. One rushed, misread copy-paste later, and funds vanish into a thief's pocket. It's social engineering at its most effective, preying on haste and human fallibility.

Binance's Counter-Strike

CZ isn't having it. The Binance chief is pushing new protocol-level measures designed to flag and intercept these malicious transactions before they settle. Think of it as a cryptographic immune response—identifying the poison before the network digests it. The move signals a shift from post-theft forensics to pre-emptive defense.

The Eternal Cat-and-Mouse Game

Every security upgrade sparks a criminal innovation. As exchanges and wallets bolt on more verification layers, scammers refine their mimicry. This $50 million loss is a stark tax on the ecosystem's growing pains, a reminder that for all the talk of decentralization, the onus of safety still falls heavily on the individual. It’s the inconvenient truth behind the 'be your own bank' slogan—sometimes you're the bank manager, and sometimes you're the easily phished teller.

The fix won't come from a single update. It demands a combination of smarter tech, relentless user education, and perhaps a dash of old-fashioned skepticism. Because in crypto, the most volatile asset isn't on the chart—it's the gap between a perfect protocol and the person using it.

TLDR

  • Binance’s Changpeng Zhao calls for blocking poisoned addresses after a $50M loss in USDT.
  • Address poisoning scams cost victims $7.7 million in November, with $50M lost recently.
  • Binance’s security team identified 15 million poisoned addresses to fight the growing threat.
  • Zhao proposes filtering small transactions and blacklisting scam addresses to improve security.

Binance co-founder Changpeng Zhao has proposed new security measures to fight address poisoning, a growing phishing threat in the crypto world. His call comes after a victim lost $50 million in a recent scam. Zhao suggests wallet providers should block transactions to “poison addresses” and filter out small-value transactions to prevent fraud. This proposal aims to protect users from this increasingly common and damaging scam technique in cryptocurrency.

CZ Proposes Fix to Address Poisoning After Investor Loses $50M

Changpeng Zhao, co-founder of Binance, has proposed new security measures aimed at eliminating address poisoning, a common phishing tactic. The recommendation comes after a victim lost $50 million in USDT (Tether) due to a scam involving address poisoning.

This phishing scheme, which has affected many cryptocurrency users, relies on attackers sending small initial transactions to trick victims into sending funds to fraudulent addresses.

https://twitter.com/MartiniGuyYT/status/2003843308624515229?s=20 

Zhao’s proposal urges wallet providers to adopt security features that WOULD block transactions to “poison addresses.” In his blog post, Zhao emphasized the importance of checking receiving addresses and preventing users from sending funds to addresses identified as risky.

Address poisoning is increasingly becoming a significant threat within the crypto space. The scheme tricked users into copying and pasting malicious addresses from their wallet transaction history, leading to massive losses.

Rising Threat of Address Poisoning

Address poisoning occurs when scammers send small amounts of cryptocurrency to a victim’s wallet to make their address appear legitimate. The victim, unaware of the fraudulent intent, then copies this address when conducting a transaction. By this method, attackers deceive users into sending large sums to their illicit wallets.

The attack vector has become a focal point in the broader issue of cryptocurrency-related phishing attacks. According to Scam Sniffer data, phishing scams in November 2024 alone cost victims over $7.7 million. This figure is expected to rise, particularly after the recent incident where a single victim lost $50 million in USDT.

Security companies have identified phishing, including address poisoning, as one of the most damaging threats facing the crypto community. CertiK, a leading security firm, has highlighted this scam type as a key concern for 2024, predicting that attackers will exploit address poisoning to steal large sums from unsuspecting users.

Binance’s Algorithm to Combat Address Poisoning

To address the growing problem, Binance’s security team developed an algorithm to identify poisoned addresses. This system has already flagged around 15 million addresses that are believed to be used for address poisoning scams. The algorithm helps prevent users from interacting with these risky addresses by blocking or warning them before completing a transaction.

Zhao’s new proposal suggests that wallets should not only block transactions to poisoned addresses but also implement filters to remove spam transactions with small values. This measure would prevent users from being misled by seemingly harmless transactions that are part of a broader scam strategy. Zhao’s call for widespread adoption of this system aims to reduce the prevalence of such attacks.

Call for Industry-Wide Action

Zhao’s plea to the crypto industry is a call for greater collaboration in developing solutions to combat phishing and address poisoning. He stresses that all wallet providers should integrate features that automatically check for poisoned addresses before processing transactions. Additionally, blacklists of scam addresses could be shared across platforms to warn users in real time.

“Wallets should not display spam transactions at all,” Zhao wrote. He further advocated for making the detection and blocking of scam addresses a routine process in crypto wallets. The introduction of such security measures could significantly reduce the risk of address poisoning and prevent further financial losses.

Despite the progress made, including the identification of millions of poisoned addresses, phishing scams remain a serious concern. Crypto security experts are urging users to be more vigilant and rely on the latest tools and security updates to protect their assets.

|Square

Get the BTCC app to start your crypto journey

Get started today Scan to join our 100M+ users

All articles reposted on this platform are sourced from public networks and are intended solely for the purpose of disseminating industry information. They do not represent any official stance of BTCC. All intellectual property rights belong to their original authors. If you believe any content infringes upon your rights or is suspected of copyright violation, please contact us at [email protected]. We will address the matter promptly and in accordance with applicable laws.BTCC makes no explicit or implied warranties regarding the accuracy, timeliness, or completeness of the republished information and assumes no direct or indirect liability for any consequences arising from reliance on such content. All materials are provided for industry research reference only and shall not be construed as investment, legal, or business advice. BTCC bears no legal responsibility for any actions taken based on the content provided herein.